Mon, 21 November 2016
A prestigious medical journal, The New England Journal Of Medicine, published a study claiming breast cancer is being over-diagnosed and the blame can be laid on mammograms. The head researcher questioned the whole screening process saying that 'screening is a choice, not a public health imperative.' His reasoning? According to his data, Dr. Welch concluded that many tumors or lumps found in breast tissue would never transform into metastatic breast cancer. He claims that tumor size is not as important as biological characteristics which imaging (mammograms included) can never show. Of course, this opinion does not go uncontested. Dr. Daniel Kopans argues that the data is flawed and mammograms are great screening tools. He mentions that breast cancer increased 1%/year from 1940 to 1980 and that screening is a life-saving procedure for most women. We did find it interesting that Dr. Daniel Kopans receives research grant money from GE Medical, who also happens to make equipment for mammograms. What we covered:
Direct download: 195_Is_Breast_Cancer_Being_Over_Diagnosed.mp3
Category:general -- posted at: 4:48pm EDT |